Search
Compare

Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.6/10 Score 3372
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 1000
$ 230
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.2 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.7 GHz

18% higher

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
46% faster

76.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

10

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 12 MB (8MB) 40% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% faster
CONS 2
CPU Turbo Clock 3.7 GHz vs 4.5 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3372
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 3960X AMD Ryzen 3960X
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs