Search
Compare

Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 1000
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.2 GHz

11% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.7 GHz

26% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
46% faster

76.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

9

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

32% lower

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 26% higher
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower
CONS 2
Cache 16 MB vs 20 MB (4MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% slower
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-3330 Intel i5-3330
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-9400F Intel i5-9400F
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 2920X AMD Ryzen 2920X
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs