Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 290
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

3.6 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
62% faster

68 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

32 GB

Generation

5

3

Socket

2011

1155

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

61% lower

55 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 6 vs 2 (4) 67% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 4 (8) 67% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (3.6GHz) 100% higher
Cache 15 MB vs 3 MB (12MB) 80% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (42.4GB/s) 62% faster
Maximum Memory 64 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (32GB) 50% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 55 Watts Power consumption is (85Watts) 61% higher
2nd Choice
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-3225 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4690S Intel i5-4690S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-4130 Intel i3-4130
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-9100 Intel i3-9100
vs