Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.6/10 Score 3352
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
27% higher

3.3 GHz

2.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

10% higher

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39% faster

68 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

10

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

75% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3352
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 75% lower
CONS 3
CPU Clock 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.9GHz) 27% lower
Cache 12 MB vs 15 MB (3MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
AMD Ryzen 1900X AMD Ryzen 1900X
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i3-7100 Intel i3-7100
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i3-3220T Intel i3-3220T
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i5-4690S Intel i5-4690S
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
vs