Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3263
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 260
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
6% higher

3.3 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

16% higher

4.3 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39% faster

68 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

8

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.5/10 Score 3263
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8600 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 16% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 4
Threads 6 vs 12 (6) 50% less logical cores
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% lower
Cache 9 MB vs 15 MB (6MB) 40% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i5-7400 Intel i5-7400
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i5-3450S Intel i5-3450S
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs