Search
Compare

Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card

3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
5.2/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 380
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2816

4096

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
16% higher

1190 MHz

1000 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
23% higher

1291 MHz

1000 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

HBM

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
86% higher

7 Gbps

1 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

4096 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

336 GB/s

34% higher

512 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

176

256

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

96

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
48% higher

124 GP/s

64 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

227 GT/s

11% higher

256 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

7 Flop/s

8 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

198 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

30% lower

175 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
5% higher

56 fps

53 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
11% higher

53 fps

47 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
7% higher

55 fps

51 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
17% higher

54 fps

45 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
25% higher

61 fps

46 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
14% higher

57 fps

49 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

7% higher

41 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
11% higher

56 fps

50 fps

Recommended
3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 13
GPU Clock 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (190MHz) 16% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1291 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (291MHz) 23% higher
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 4 GB (2GB) 33% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 7 Gbps vs 1 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (6Gbps) 86% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 64 (32) 33% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 124 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (60GP/s) 48% faster
Rise of the Tomb Raider 56 fps vs 53 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (3fps) 5% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53 fps vs 47 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (6fps) 11% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 55 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (4fps) 7% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 54 fps vs 45 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (9fps) 17% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 61 fps vs 46 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (15fps) 25% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 57 fps vs 49 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (8fps) 14% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 56 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (6fps) 11% more frames per second
CONS 7
Shading Units 2816 vs 4096 (1280) 31% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 512 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (176GB/s) 34% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 176 vs 256 (80) 31% less Texture Mapping Units
Texture Fill Rate 227 GT/s vs 256 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (29GT/s) 11% slower
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 8 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 13% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 175 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 30% higher
Assassin's Creed Unity 38 fps vs 41 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (3fps) 7% less frames per second
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 270 Radeon R9 270
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon RX 460 Radeon RX 460
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia TITAN Xp Nvidia TITAN Xp
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
AMD RX 5600 AMD RX 5600
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 950 Nvidia GTX 950
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 270 Radeon R9 270
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia Turbo 1060 Nvidia Turbo 1060
vs