Compare

Nvidia GTX 780 Ti 3GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card

2.4/10 Score 2745

2.4/10 Score 2793

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card

$ 200

$ 150

Compare

Share with friends

Copy link

Facebook

Twitter

Navigation Compare navigation

Left Won
Draw
Left Lost

GPU Architecture Shading Units GPU Clock GPU Boost Clock Memory Capacity Memory Type Memory Speed Memory Bus Width Memory Bandwidth Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill Rate Texture Fill Rate Floating Point Per Second DirectX OpenGL Max GPU Temprature Graphics Card Power Rise of the Tomb Raider Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Witcher 3 Metro Exodus Battlefield 1 Far Cry 5 Assassin's Creed Unity Resident Evil 2

Go to Results

Visual view Simple view

GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

12 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2880

896

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

875 MHz

41% higher

1485 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

928 MHz

44% higher

1665 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

3 GB

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

7 Gbps

13% higher

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

128 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

62% higher

336 GB/s

128 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

240

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

45 GP/s

15% higher

53 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

58% higher

223 GT/s

93 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

5 Flop/s

3 Flop/s

DirectX

OpenGL

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

70% lower

75 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

34 fps

28% higher

47 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

5% higher

39 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

3% higher

38 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

5% higher

37 fps

35 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

27 fps

31% higher

39 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

33 fps

11% higher

37 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

3% higher

37 fps

36 fps

Recommended

2.4/10 Score 2793

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

PROS 12

GPU Architecture	12 nm vs 28 nm	GPU architecture size is (16nm) 57% smaller
GPU Clock	1485 MHz vs 875 MHz	Clock speed is (610MHz) 41% higher
GPU Boost Clock	1665 MHz vs 928 MHz	Boost clock speed is (737MHz) 44% higher
Memory Capacity	4 GB vs 3 GB	(1GB) 25% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed	8 Gbps vs 7 Gbps	Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 13% faster
Pixel Fill Rate	53 GP/s vs 45 GP/s	Pixel Fill Rate is (8GP/s) 15% faster
Graphics Card Power	75 Watts vs 250 Watts	Power consumption is (175Watts) 70% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider	47 fps vs 34 fps	Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (13fps) 28% more frames per second
The Witcher 3	39 fps vs 37 fps	The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (2fps) 5% more frames per second
Metro Exodus	38 fps vs 37 fps	Metro Exodus - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Far Cry 5	39 fps vs 27 fps	Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (12fps) 31% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity	37 fps vs 33 fps	Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (4fps) 11% more frames per second

CONS 8

Shading Units	896 vs 2880	(1984) 69% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s vs 336 GB/s	Memory bandwidth is (208GB/s) 62% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)	56 vs 240	(184) 77% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP)	32 vs 48	(16) 33% less Render Output Units
Texture Fill Rate	93 GT/s vs 223 GT/s	Texel Fill Rate is (130GT/s) 58% slower
Floating Point Per Second	3 Flop/s vs 5 Flop/s	(2Flop/s) 40% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Battlefield 1	35 fps vs 37 fps	Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (2fps) 5% less frames per second
Resident Evil 2	36 fps vs 37 fps	Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (1fps) 3% less frames per second

2nd Choice

2.4/10 Score 2745

Nvidia GTX 780 Ti 3GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side

3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$640
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$600
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3762

Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3749

AMD RX 5700 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$358
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3709

Nvidia Windforce 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3687

Nvidia RTX 2060 6GB 14Gbps 192-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs