Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card

2.4/10 Score 2793
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 150
$ 380
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

12 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

896

2816

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
20% higher

1485 MHz

1190 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
22% higher

1665 MHz

1291 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

6 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
13% higher

8 Gbps

7 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

128 bit

384 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

128 GB/s

62% higher

336 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

56

176

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

32

96

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

53 GP/s

57% higher

124 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

93 GT/s

59% higher

227 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

3 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

198 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
70% lower

75 Watts

250 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

47 fps

16% higher

56 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

28% higher

53 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

39 fps

29% higher

55 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

30% higher

54 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

43% higher

61 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

39 fps

32% higher

57 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

3% higher

38 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

36% higher

56 fps

Recommended
3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 16
Shading Units 2816 vs 896 (1920) 68% more Shader Processing Units
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 4 GB (2GB) 33% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 128 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (208GB/s) 62% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 176 vs 56 (120) 68% more Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 32 (64) 67% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 124 GP/s vs 53 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (71GP/s) 57% faster
Texture Fill Rate 227 GT/s vs 93 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (134GT/s) 59% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 3 Flop/s (4Flop/s) 57% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 56 fps vs 47 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (9fps) 16% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53 fps vs 38 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (15fps) 28% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 55 fps vs 39 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (16fps) 29% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 54 fps vs 38 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (16fps) 30% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 61 fps vs 35 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (26fps) 43% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 57 fps vs 39 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (18fps) 32% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 38 fps vs 37 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 56 fps vs 36 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (20fps) 36% more frames per second
CONS 5
GPU Architecture 28 nm vs 12 nm GPU architecture size is (16nm) 57% bigger
GPU Clock 1190 MHz vs 1485 MHz Clock speed is (295MHz) 20% lower
GPU Boost Clock 1291 MHz vs 1665 MHz Boost clock speed is (374MHz) 22% lower
Memory Speed 7 Gbps vs 8 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 13% slower
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 75 Watts Power consumption is (175Watts) 70% higher
2nd Choice
2.4/10 Score 2793
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 3080 Nvidia RTX 3080
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 FURY Radeon R9 FURY
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 3070 Nvidia RTX 3070
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
AMD RX 5700 AMD RX 5700
vs