Search
Compare

Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card

3.1/10 Score 3614
Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
2.3/10 Score 2683
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 400
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

16 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1920

2560

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
37% higher

1506 MHz

947 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
44% higher

1683 MHz

947 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

8 GB

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
38% higher

8 Gbps

5 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

256 bit

512 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

256 GB/s

20% higher

320 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

120

160

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
44% higher

108 GP/s

61 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
25% higher

202 GT/s

152 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

7 Flop/s

5 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

201 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
45% lower

150 Watts

275 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
54% higher

71 fps

33 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
36% higher

50 fps

32 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
52% higher

67 fps

32 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
52% higher

69 fps

33 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
65% higher

82 fps

29 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
58% higher

66 fps

28 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
17% higher

36 fps

30 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
49% higher

65 fps

33 fps

Recommended
3.1/10 Score 3614
Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 17
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1506 MHz vs 947 MHz Clock speed is (559MHz) 37% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1683 MHz vs 947 MHz Boost clock speed is (736MHz) 44% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 4 GB (4GB) 50% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 5 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (3Gbps) 38% faster
Pixel Fill Rate 108 GP/s vs 61 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (47GP/s) 44% faster
Texture Fill Rate 202 GT/s vs 152 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (50GT/s) 25% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 5 Flop/s (2Flop/s) 29% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 150 Watts vs 275 Watts Power consumption is (125Watts) 45% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 71 fps vs 33 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (38fps) 54% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50 fps vs 32 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (18fps) 36% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 67 fps vs 32 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (35fps) 52% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 69 fps vs 33 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (36fps) 52% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 82 fps vs 29 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (53fps) 65% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 66 fps vs 28 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (38fps) 58% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 36 fps vs 30 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (6fps) 17% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 65 fps vs 33 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (32fps) 49% more frames per second
CONS 3
Shading Units 1920 vs 2560 (640) 25% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 320 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (64GB/s) 20% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 120 vs 160 (40) 25% less Texture Mapping Units
2nd Choice
2.3/10 Score 2683
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia GTX 780 Nvidia GTX 780
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia RTX 4080 Nvidia RTX 4080
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia RTX 4090 Nvidia RTX 4090
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia JetStream 1070 Nvidia JetStream 1070
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia RTX 2060 Nvidia RTX 2060
vs
Nvidia Dual 1070 Nvidia Dual 1070
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
vs