Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor Intel i3-3220 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3220 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 544
$ 130
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

4 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

5 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
38% faster

41.6 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

9

3

Socket

1151

1155

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

127 Watts

57% lower

55 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (5GHz) 100% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 3 MB (13MB) 81% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 55 Watts Power consumption is (72Watts) 57% higher
2nd Choice
1.8/10 Score 1303
Intel i3-3220 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-3220 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1155 55W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-6100T Intel i3-6100T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
vs