Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 544
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
20% higher

4 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
26% higher

5 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

46% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

6

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
9% lower

127 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.8GHz) 20% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 26% higher
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (13Watts) 9% lower
CONS 2
Cache 16 MB vs 20 MB (4MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% slower
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-6100T Intel i3-6100T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-8700T Intel i7-8700T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-3770 Intel i7-3770
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs