Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3786
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 544
$ 199
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
5% higher

4 GHz

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
12% higher

5 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

32 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

13% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

0

Socket

1151

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

127 Watts

25% lower

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 12% higher
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
Cache 16 MB vs 32 MB (16MB) 50% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (6GB/s) 13% slower
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 95 Watts Power consumption is (32Watts) 25% higher
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3786
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-4570S Intel i5-4570S
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-7350K Intel i3-7350K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-7100 Intel i3-7100
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-4590 Intel i5-4590
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3470T Intel i5-3470T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-9700T Intel i7-9700T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-7400 Intel i5-7400
vs