Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-3770 4-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 77W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
2.1/10 Score 1531
Intel i7-3770 4-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 77W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 583
$ 360
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

9% higher

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
36% higher

5 GHz

3.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
38% faster

41.6 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

9

3

Socket

1151

1155

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
16% lower

65 Watts

77 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.8GHz) 36% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 77 Watts Power consumption is (12Watts) 16% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 9% lower
2nd Choice
2.1/10 Score 1531
Intel i7-3770 4-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 77W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-3770 4-core 3.4 GHz Socket 1155 77W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3350P Intel i5-3350P
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs