Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 580
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.7 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
11% higher

4.5 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

19 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
54% faster

94 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

256 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

2066

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

165 Watts

61% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 10 vs 4 (6) 60% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 8 (12) 60% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 11% higher
Cache 19 MB vs 8 MB (11MB) 58% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (50.3GB/s) 54% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (192GB) 75% more
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (100Watts) 61% higher
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-3330S Intel i5-3330S
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-11500 Intel i5-11500
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-5960X Intel i7-5960X
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-6500 Intel i5-6500
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs