Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6850K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
5/10 Score 3672
Intel i7-6850K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 520
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

1.9 GHz

47% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
17% higher

4.6 GHz

3.8 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

40% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

6

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
75% lower

35 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 17% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 15 MB (5MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 75% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 1.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (1.7GHz) 47% lower
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (31GB/s) 40% slower
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3672
Intel i7-6850K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6850K 6-core 3.6 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-8600K Intel i5-8600K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-4690K Intel i5-4690K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs