Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-11900T 8-core 1.5 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3588
Intel i9-11900T 8-core 1.5 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
46% higher

2.8 GHz

1.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
6% higher

5.2 GHz

4.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

8% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

11

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Clock speed is (1.3GHz) 46% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 4.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 6% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 2
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 8% slower
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% higher
2nd Choice
4.9/10 Score 3588
Intel i9-11900T 8-core 1.5 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900T 8-core 1.5 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4330 Intel i3-4330
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-6600K Intel i5-6600K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-4570T Intel i5-4570T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4340 Intel i3-4340
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs