Search
Compare

Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor

4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 327
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

25% higher

4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.7 GHz

6% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

9

Socket

1151

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
49% lower

65 Watts

127 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 25% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 6% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (62Watts) 49% higher
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3382
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700F 8-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-11600T Intel i5-11600T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-6800K Intel i7-6800K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-10500T Intel i5-10500T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-3225 Intel i3-3225
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs