Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 583
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
6% higher

3.3 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

28% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39% faster

68 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

9

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.4GHz) 28% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% lower
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-4440 Intel i5-4440
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-4440 Intel i5-4440
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-7700 Intel i7-7700
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-6700 Intel i7-6700
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-6402P Intel i5-6402P
vs