Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 583
$ 400
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

18% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

5 GHz

2% higher

5.1 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

9% faster

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.1 GHz vs 5 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.1GHz) 2% higher
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-3220 Intel i3-3220
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-6402P Intel i5-6402P
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-8700K Intel i7-8700K
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-9500T Intel i5-9500T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-10500 Intel i5-10500
vs