Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i5-6600 4-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3/10 Score 2191
Intel i5-6600 4-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 210
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

8% higher

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

6 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
50% faster

68 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

5

6

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 4 (8) 67% more logical cores
Cache 15 MB vs 6 MB (9MB) 60% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (33.9GB/s) 50% faster
CONS 3
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% smaller
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3/10 Score 2191
Intel i5-6600 4-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-6600 4-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-9700 Intel i7-9700
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-11900KF Intel i9-11900KF
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-8300T Intel i3-8300T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs