Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 580
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

11% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

20% higher

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

19 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

68 GB/s

28% faster

94 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

256 GB

Generation

5

10

Socket

2011

2066

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
15% lower

140 Watts

165 Watts

Recommended
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 20% higher
Cache 19 MB vs 15 MB (4MB) 21% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26GB/s) 28% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (192GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (25Watts) 15% higher
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-4790S Intel i7-4790S
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-8700K Intel i7-8700K
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs