Search
Compare

Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor

4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 544
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

30% higher

4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.8 GHz

4% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

12 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
17% faster

50 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
49% lower

65 Watts

127 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (1.2GHz) 30% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 4% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 2
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (8.4GB/s) 17% slower
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (62Watts) 49% higher
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3340S Intel i5-3340S
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs