Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 600
$ 440
Share with friends
Copy link
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

16

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

32

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.4 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

4 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
14% faster

79.4 GB/s

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

2048 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

5

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

180 Watts

22% lower

140 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Compatible
PROS 8
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more physical cores
Threads 32 vs 12 (20) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
Cache 32 MB vs 15 MB (17MB) 53% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 79.4 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (11.4GB/s) 14% faster
Maximum Memory 2048 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (1984GB) 97% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 180 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (40Watts) 22% higher
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Compatible
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side