Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6700T 4-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
3.1/10 Score 2256
Intel i7-6700T 4-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 600
$ 360
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

16

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

32

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

3.4 GHz

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

4 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
57% faster

79.4 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

2048 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

180 Watts

81% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more physical cores
Threads 32 vs 8 (24) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% higher
Cache 32 MB vs 8 MB (24MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 79.4 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (45.3GB/s) 57% faster
Maximum Memory 2048 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (1984GB) 97% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 180 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (145Watts) 81% higher
2nd Choice
3.1/10 Score 2256
Intel i7-6700T 4-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6700T 4-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-6600 Intel i5-6600
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-4440 Intel i5-4440
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-4670 Intel i5-4670
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-4690K Intel i5-4690K
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i7-4771 Intel i7-4771
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs