Search
Compare

Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card

2.8/10 Score 3250
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
2.5/10 Score 2962
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 260
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

16 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1280

2560

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
34% higher

1506 MHz

1000 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
41% higher

1708 MHz

1000 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
25% higher

8 Gbps

6 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

192 bit

512 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

192 GB/s

50% higher

384 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

80

160

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

48

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
22% higher

82 GP/s

64 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

137 GT/s

14% higher

160 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

4 Flop/s

5 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

201 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
56% lower

120 Watts

275 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
25% higher

51 fps

38 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
16% higher

43 fps

36 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
16% higher

45 fps

38 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
21% higher

47 fps

37 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
41% higher

61 fps

36 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
26% higher

47 fps

35 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
3% higher

34 fps

33 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
27% higher

48 fps

35 fps

Recommended
2.8/10 Score 3250
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 14
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (506MHz) 34% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1708 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (708MHz) 41% higher
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (2Gbps) 25% faster
Pixel Fill Rate 82 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (18GP/s) 22% faster
Graphics Card Power 120 Watts vs 275 Watts Power consumption is (155Watts) 56% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 51 fps vs 38 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (13fps) 25% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43 fps vs 36 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (7fps) 16% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 45 fps vs 38 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (7fps) 16% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 47 fps vs 37 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (10fps) 21% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 61 fps vs 36 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (25fps) 41% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 47 fps vs 35 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (12fps) 26% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 34 fps vs 33 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 48 fps vs 35 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (13fps) 27% more frames per second
CONS 7
Shading Units 1280 vs 2560 (1280) 50% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 8 GB (2GB) 25% less VRAM Capacity
Memory Bandwidth 192 GB/s vs 384 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (192GB/s) 50% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 80 vs 160 (80) 50% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 48 vs 64 (16) 25% less Render Output Units
Texture Fill Rate 137 GT/s vs 160 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (23GT/s) 14% slower
Floating Point Per Second 4 Flop/s vs 5 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 20% less Floating Point Operations per minute
2nd Choice
2.5/10 Score 2962
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Radeon R9 270 Radeon R9 270
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia GTX Titan Black Nvidia GTX Titan Black
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia EVGA GTX 1080 Nvidia EVGA GTX 1080
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia JetStream 1070 Nvidia JetStream 1070
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
AMD RX 560 AMD RX 560
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia RTX 3080 Nvidia RTX 3080
vs
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
Nvidia RTX 2070 SUPER Nvidia RTX 2070 SUPER
vs