Search
Compare

Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card

3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
1.8/10 Score 2088
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 380
$ 140
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2816

1152

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
18% higher

1190 MHz

980 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
20% higher

1291 MHz

1033 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

2 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
14% higher

7 Gbps

6 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
43% higher

336 GB/s

192 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

176

96

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

96

32

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
73% higher

124 GP/s

33 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
56% higher

227 GT/s

99 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

7 Flop/s

2 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

198 °F

207 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

32% lower

170 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
61% higher

56 fps

22 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
55% higher

53 fps

24 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
51% higher

55 fps

27 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
46% higher

54 fps

29 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
54% higher

61 fps

28 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
60% higher

57 fps

23 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
37% higher

38 fps

24 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
57% higher

56 fps

24 fps

Recommended
3/10 Score 3456
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 19
Shading Units 2816 vs 1152 (1664) 59% more Shader Processing Units
GPU Clock 1190 MHz vs 980 MHz Clock speed is (210MHz) 18% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1291 MHz vs 1033 MHz Boost clock speed is (258MHz) 20% higher
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 2 GB (4GB) 67% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 7 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 14% faster
Memory Bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 192 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (144GB/s) 43% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 176 vs 96 (80) 45% more Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 32 (64) 67% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 124 GP/s vs 33 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (91GP/s) 73% faster
Texture Fill Rate 227 GT/s vs 99 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (128GT/s) 56% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 2 Flop/s (5Flop/s) 71% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 56 fps vs 22 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (34fps) 61% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53 fps vs 24 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (29fps) 55% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 55 fps vs 27 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (28fps) 51% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 54 fps vs 29 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (25fps) 46% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 61 fps vs 28 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (33fps) 54% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 57 fps vs 23 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (34fps) 60% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 38 fps vs 24 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (14fps) 37% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 56 fps vs 24 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (32fps) 57% more frames per second
CONS 1
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 170 Watts Power consumption is (80Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
1.8/10 Score 2088
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
AMD RX 5700 AMD RX 5700
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 770 Nvidia GTX 770
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
AMD RX 5700 XT AMD RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 2080 Nvidia RTX 2080
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 270X Radeon R9 270X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
vs