Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12GB 10Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card

4.7/10 Score 4209
Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12GB 10Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 1490
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

16 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

3584

4096

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
29% higher

1417 MHz

1000 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
35% higher

1531 MHz

1000 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

12 GB

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5X

HBM

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
90% higher

10 Gbps

1 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

4096 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

480 GB/s

6% higher

512 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

224

256

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

96

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
56% higher

147 GP/s

64 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
25% higher

343 GT/s

256 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

11 Flop/s

8 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

201 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

30% lower

175 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

22 fps

58% higher

53 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
43% higher

83 fps

47 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
50% higher

101 fps

51 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
56% higher

102 fps

45 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
61% higher

118 fps

46 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
52% higher

102 fps

49 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
51% higher

83 fps

41 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
55% higher

112 fps

50 fps

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 4209
Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12GB 10Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12GB 10Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 16
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (417MHz) 29% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1531 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (531MHz) 35% higher
Memory Capacity 12 GB vs 4 GB (8GB) 67% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (9Gbps) 90% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 64 (32) 33% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 147 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (83GP/s) 56% faster
Texture Fill Rate 343 GT/s vs 256 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (87GT/s) 25% faster
Floating Point Per Second 11 Flop/s vs 8 Flop/s (3Flop/s) 27% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83 fps vs 47 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (36fps) 43% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 101 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (50fps) 50% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 102 fps vs 45 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (57fps) 56% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 118 fps vs 46 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (72fps) 61% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 102 fps vs 49 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (53fps) 52% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 83 fps vs 41 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (42fps) 51% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 112 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (62fps) 55% more frames per second
CONS 5
Shading Units 3584 vs 4096 (512) 13% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 480 GB/s vs 512 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (32GB/s) 6% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 224 vs 256 (32) 13% less Texture Mapping Units
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 175 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 30% higher
Rise of the Tomb Raider 22 fps vs 53 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (31fps) 58% less frames per second
2nd Choice
6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Radeon R9 380 Radeon R9 380
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia RTX 2080 Nvidia RTX 2080
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia GTX 780 Nvidia GTX 780
vs
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti
vs