Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card

2.2/10 Score 2509
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 180
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

14 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2304

2304

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

863 MHz

41% higher

1469 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

900 MHz

42% higher

1545 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

3 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

6 Gbps

25% higher

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
11% higher

288 GB/s

256 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

192

144

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

48

32

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

43 GP/s

12% higher

49 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

173 GT/s

22% higher

223 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

4 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

30% lower

175 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

27 fps

54% higher

59 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

34 fps

19% higher

42 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

35% higher

54 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

36% higher

56 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

51% higher

74 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

26 fps

54% higher

56 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
10% higher

31 fps

28 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

33 fps

47% higher

62 fps

Recommended
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 16
GPU Architecture 14 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (14nm) 50% smaller
GPU Clock 1469 MHz vs 863 MHz Clock speed is (606MHz) 41% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1545 MHz vs 900 MHz Boost clock speed is (645MHz) 42% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 3 GB (5GB) 63% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (2Gbps) 25% faster
Pixel Fill Rate 49 GP/s vs 43 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (6GP/s) 12% faster
Texture Fill Rate 223 GT/s vs 173 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (50GT/s) 22% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 4 Flop/s (3Flop/s) 43% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 175 Watts vs 250 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 30% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 fps vs 27 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (32fps) 54% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 fps vs 34 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (8fps) 19% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 54 fps vs 35 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (19fps) 35% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 56 fps vs 36 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (20fps) 36% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 74 fps vs 36 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (38fps) 51% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 56 fps vs 26 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (30fps) 54% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 62 fps vs 33 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (29fps) 47% more frames per second
CONS 4
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 288 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (32GB/s) 11% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 144 vs 192 (48) 25% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 32 vs 48 (16) 33% less Render Output Units
Assassin's Creed Unity 28 fps vs 31 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (3fps) 10% less frames per second
2nd Choice
2.2/10 Score 2509
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
AMD RX 5600 AMD RX 5600
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
AMD RX 560 AMD RX 560
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia JetStream 1070 Nvidia JetStream 1070
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1660 Nvidia GTX 1660
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Radeon R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Radeon RX 480 Radeon RX 480
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER
vs