Compare

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 290X 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 290W Desktop Graphic card

2.4/10 Score 2793

2.4/10 Score 2797

Radeon R9 290X 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 290W Desktop Graphic card

$ 150

$ 220

Compare

Share with friends

Copy link

Facebook

Twitter

Navigation Compare navigation

Left Won
Draw
Left Lost

GPU Architecture Shading Units GPU Clock GPU Boost Clock Memory Capacity Memory Type Memory Speed Memory Bus Width Memory Bandwidth Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill Rate Texture Fill Rate Floating Point Per Second DirectX OpenGL Max GPU Temprature Graphics Card Power Rise of the Tomb Raider Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Witcher 3 Metro Exodus Battlefield 1 Far Cry 5 Assassin's Creed Unity Resident Evil 2

Go to Results

Visual view Simple view

GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

12 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

896

2816

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

33% higher

1485 MHz

1000 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

40% higher

1665 MHz

1000 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

38% higher

8 Gbps

5 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

128 bit

512 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

128 GB/s

60% higher

320 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

176

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

53 GP/s

17% higher

64 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

93 GT/s

47% higher

176 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

3 Flop/s

6 Flop/s

DirectX

OpenGL

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

74% lower

75 Watts

290 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

21% higher

47 fps

37 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

3% higher

38 fps

37 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

3% higher

39 fps

38 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

3% higher

38 fps

37 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

13% higher

39 fps

34 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

5% higher

37 fps

35 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

3% higher

37 fps

Recommended

2.4/10 Score 2793

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

PROS 11

GPU Architecture	12 nm vs 28 nm	GPU architecture size is (16nm) 57% smaller
GPU Clock	1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz	Clock speed is (485MHz) 33% higher
GPU Boost Clock	1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz	Boost clock speed is (665MHz) 40% higher
Memory Speed	8 Gbps vs 5 Gbps	Transfer speed of the memory is (3Gbps) 38% faster
Graphics Card Power	75 Watts vs 290 Watts	Power consumption is (215Watts) 74% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider	47 fps vs 37 fps	Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (10fps) 21% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38 fps vs 37 fps	Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
The Witcher 3	39 fps vs 38 fps	The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Metro Exodus	38 fps vs 37 fps	Metro Exodus - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Far Cry 5	39 fps vs 34 fps	Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (5fps) 13% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity	37 fps vs 35 fps	Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (2fps) 5% more frames per second

CONS 8

Shading Units	896 vs 2816	(1920) 68% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s vs 320 GB/s	Memory bandwidth is (192GB/s) 60% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)	56 vs 176	(120) 68% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP)	32 vs 64	(32) 50% less Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate	53 GP/s vs 64 GP/s	Pixel Fill Rate is (11GP/s) 17% slower
Texture Fill Rate	93 GT/s vs 176 GT/s	Texel Fill Rate is (83GT/s) 47% slower
Floating Point Per Second	3 Flop/s vs 6 Flop/s	(3Flop/s) 50% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Resident Evil 2	36 fps vs 37 fps	Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (1fps) 3% less frames per second

2nd Choice

2.4/10 Score 2797

Radeon R9 290X 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 290W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side

3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$640
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$600
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3762

Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3749

AMD RX 5700 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$358
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3709

Nvidia Windforce 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3687

Nvidia RTX 2060 6GB 14Gbps 192-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs