Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 460
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.1 GHz

25% higher

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.4 GHz

15% higher

5.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

9% faster

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
46% lower

35 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 25% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 15% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% higher
2nd Choice
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-3475S Intel i5-3475S
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs