Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 400
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.1 GHz

45% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.4 GHz

14% higher

5.1 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

9% faster

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
72% lower

35 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Clock speed is (1.7GHz) 45% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 14% higher
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (90Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-8300T Intel i3-8300T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-4340 Intel i3-4340
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i3-8100 Intel i3-8100
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs