Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 119
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.1 GHz

38% higher

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
11% higher

4.4 GHz

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

5% faster

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

0

Socket

1151

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
46% lower

35 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 11% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 3
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
CPU Clock 2.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (1.3GHz) 38% lower
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.1GB/s) 5% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-7400 Intel i5-7400
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-4330 Intel i3-4330
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-4670T Intel i5-4670T
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-3550 Intel i5-3550
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
AMD Ryzen 1900X AMD Ryzen 1900X
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-3475S Intel i5-3475S
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs