Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8600T 6-core 2.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3235
Intel i5-8600T 6-core 2.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 544
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
43% higher

4 GHz

2.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
26% higher

5 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

8

Socket

1151

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

127 Watts

72% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 6 (10) 63% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Clock speed is (1.7GHz) 43% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 26% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 9 MB (7MB) 44% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (92Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
4.4/10 Score 3235
Intel i5-8600T 6-core 2.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8600T 6-core 2.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3340 Intel i5-3340
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-8700K Intel i7-8700K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3475S Intel i5-3475S
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-3570 Intel i5-3570
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs