Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor Intel i3-6300T 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
2.8/10 Score 2046
Intel i3-6300T 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 544
$ 150
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

4 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

5 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
18% faster

41.6 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

6

Socket

1151

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

127 Watts

72% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (5GHz) 100% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 4 MB (12MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (7.5GB/s) 18% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 127 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (92Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2046
Intel i3-6300T 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-6300T 2-core 3.3 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i7-10700K Intel i7-10700K
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-9100 Intel i3-9100
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i5-9600T Intel i5-9600T
vs
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs