Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
4.6/10 Score 3352
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 502
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
33% higher

3.6 GHz

2.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
20% higher

5 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

95 Watts

63% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Clock speed is (1.2GHz) 33% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1GHz) 20% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 63% higher
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3352
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10600T 6-core 2.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-4670K Intel i5-4670K
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-10300T Intel i3-10300T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-3330S Intel i5-3330S
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs