Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
4.6/10 Score 3372
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 502
$ 230
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
14% higher

3.6 GHz

3.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
10% higher

5 GHz

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

10

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

95 Watts

32% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 10% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
4.6/10 Score 3372
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-10500 6-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-3350P Intel i5-3350P
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i5-4690 Intel i5-4690
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
vs