Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 583
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

6% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
28% higher

5 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

5

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.4GHz) 28% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% lower
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-6320 Intel i3-6320
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-11700K Intel i7-11700K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-10500 Intel i5-10500
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-5930K Intel i7-5930K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-9100 Intel i3-9100
vs