Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 583
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
10% higher

3.1 GHz

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
4% higher

5 GHz

4.8 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

17% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

11

Socket

1151

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 10% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 4% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (8.4GB/s) 17% slower
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3477
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-6600K Intel i5-6600K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-4790 Intel i7-4790
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-4590T Intel i5-4590T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-4160 Intel i3-4160
vs