Search
Compare

Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor

4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3786
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 583
$ 199
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.1 GHz

18% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
12% higher

5 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

32 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

13% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

9

0

Socket

1151

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3534
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900 8-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 12% higher
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 95 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% lower
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 7 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% smaller
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% lower
Cache 16 MB vs 32 MB (16MB) 50% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 47.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (6GB/s) 13% slower
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3786
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3450 Intel i5-3450
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3470S Intel i5-3470S
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3330 Intel i5-3330
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i7-11700K Intel i7-11700K
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
Intel i5-3340 Intel i5-3340
vs