Search
Compare

Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3617
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 380
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.5 GHz

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
32% higher

5.3 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

50 GB/s

35% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

6

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
11% lower

125 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3617
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900K 8-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.7GHz) 32% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (15Watts) 11% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.8GB/s) 35% slower
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i3-10300T Intel i3-10300T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i5-7500 Intel i5-7500
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i7-4770T Intel i7-4770T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i3-4130T Intel i3-4130T
vs
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs