Search
Compare

Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 580
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.5 GHz

32% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
13% higher

5.2 GHz

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

19 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

50 GB/s

47% faster

94 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

256 GB

Generation

11

10

Socket

1200

2066

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
61% lower

65 Watts

165 Watts

Recommended
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Clock speed is (1.2GHz) 32% higher
Cache 19 MB vs 16 MB (3MB) 16% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 50 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (44GB/s) 47% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 128 GB Maximium memory is (128GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 5.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 13% lower
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (100Watts) 61% higher
2nd Choice
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-6320 Intel i3-6320
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 2990WX AMD Ryzen 2990WX
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-9100F Intel i3-9100F
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-3570S Intel i5-3570S
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs