Search
Compare

Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.5 GHz

36% higher

3.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
6% higher

5.2 GHz

4.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

50 GB/s

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

11

11

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 12 (4) 25% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 4.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 6% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 12 MB (4MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 125 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Clock speed is (1.4GHz) 36% lower
2nd Choice
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-8400 Intel i5-8400
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-6600 Intel i5-6600
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-3240 Intel i3-3240
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs