Search
Compare

Intel i9-11900 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-6600K 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1151 91W Desktop Processor

4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
3/10 Score 2176
Intel i5-6600K 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1151 91W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 230
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.5 GHz

29% higher

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
25% higher

5.2 GHz

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

6 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
32% faster

50 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

11

6

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
29% lower

65 Watts

91 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 25% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 6 MB (10MB) 63% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (15.9GB/s) 32% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 91 Watts Power consumption is (26Watts) 29% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 29% lower
2nd Choice
3/10 Score 2176
Intel i5-6600K 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1151 91W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-6600K 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1151 91W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i5-10500 Intel i5-10500
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i3-9100T Intel i3-9100T
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i5-4690 Intel i5-4690
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs