Search
Compare

Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor

6/10 Score 4373
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
3.2/10 Score 2382
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 690
$ 190
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

12

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

24

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
20% higher

3.5 GHz

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
13% higher

4.6 GHz

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

19 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
56% faster

94 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

256 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

8

Socket

2066

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

165 Watts

61% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
6/10 Score 4373
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 12 vs 6 (6) 50% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 6 (18) 75% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 20% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 13% higher
Cache 19 MB vs 9 MB (10MB) 53% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (52.4GB/s) 56% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (192GB) 75% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (100Watts) 61% higher
2nd Choice
3.2/10 Score 2382
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-8400 6-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-4150 Intel i3-4150
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-9500 Intel i5-9500
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-4440S Intel i5-4440S
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-6100T Intel i3-6100T
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i7-11700K Intel i7-11700K
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-11600T Intel i5-11600T
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs