Search
Compare

Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor Intel i5-4690 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 84W Desktop Processor

6/10 Score 4373
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
2/10 Score 1477
Intel i5-4690 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 84W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 690
$ 200
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

12

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

24

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.5 GHz

3.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
15% higher

4.6 GHz

3.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

19 MB

6 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
73% faster

94 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

256 GB

32 GB

Generation

10

4

Socket

2066

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

165 Watts

49% lower

84 Watts

Recommended
6/10 Score 4373
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10920X 12-core 3.5 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 12 vs 4 (8) 67% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 4 (20) 83% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 15% higher
Cache 19 MB vs 6 MB (13MB) 68% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (68.4GB/s) 73% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (224GB) 88% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 84 Watts Power consumption is (81Watts) 49% higher
2nd Choice
2/10 Score 1477
Intel i5-4690 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 84W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-4690 4-core 3.5 GHz Socket 1150 84W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
AMD Ryzen 2970WX AMD Ryzen 2970WX
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-6402P Intel i5-6402P
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-3225 Intel i3-3225
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i5-7500T Intel i5-7500T
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i3-8350K Intel i3-8350K
vs
Intel i9-10920X Intel i9-10920X
Intel i7-4785T Intel i7-4785T
vs