Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 580
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
14% higher

3.7 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

4.5 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

19 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
18% faster

94 GB/s

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

256 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

6

Socket

2066

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

165 Watts

15% lower

140 Watts

Recommended
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (17.2GB/s) 18% faster
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 128 GB Maximium memory is (128GB) 50% more
CONS 2
Cache 19 MB vs 20 MB (1MB) 5% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (25Watts) 15% higher
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-9350KF Intel i3-9350KF
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-8600T Intel i5-8600T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 1920X AMD Ryzen 1920X
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
vs