Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 190
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

1.9 GHz

50% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.6 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

45.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

10

Socket

1200

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
46% lower

35 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 4 (6) 60% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 8 (12) 60% more logical cores
Cache 20 MB vs 8 MB (12MB) 60% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 1.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (1.9GHz) 50% lower
2nd Choice
4.5/10 Score 3264
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10320 4-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-5775C Intel i7-5775C
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-4570 Intel i5-4570
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-5960X Intel i7-5960X
vs