Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 449
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

7 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

12

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

24

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

1.9 GHz

50% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.6 GHz

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

64 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

4% faster

47.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
67% lower

35 Watts

105 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4554
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core 3.8 GHz Socket 0 105W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 7 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (7nm) 50% bigger
Cores 12 vs 10 (2) 17% more physical cores
Threads 24 vs 20 (4) 17% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Clock speed is (1.9GHz) 50% higher
Cache 64 MB vs 20 MB (44MB) 69% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 47.6 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.8GB/s) 4% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 105 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (70Watts) 67% higher
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-3245 Intel i3-3245
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i7-6700 Intel i7-6700
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i5-3470S Intel i5-3470S
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i9-9900 Intel i9-9900
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs