Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
3.5/10 Score 2542
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 85
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

1.9 GHz

41% higher

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
22% higher

4.6 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
13% faster

45.8 GB/s

40 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

10

0

Socket

1200

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
46% lower

35 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
5/10 Score 3694
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900T 10-core 1.9 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1GHz) 22% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 40 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (5.8GB/s) 13% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 1.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (1.3GHz) 41% lower
2nd Choice
3.5/10 Score 2542
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-4690 Intel i5-4690
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-4790T Intel i7-4790T
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-11700 Intel i7-11700
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i5-3350P Intel i5-3350P
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
Intel i7-6950X Intel i7-6950X
vs