Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 760
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
43% higher

3.7 GHz

2.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
17% higher

5.3 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

45.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

9

Socket

1200

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

125 Watts

72% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3720
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900K 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Clock speed is (1.6GHz) 43% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.9GHz) 17% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 20% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4.2GB/s) 9% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (90Watts) 72% higher
2nd Choice
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-9400F Intel i5-9400F
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-6600 Intel i5-6600
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i7-6700K Intel i7-6700K
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4430 Intel i5-4430
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i5-4590 Intel i5-4590
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
Intel i9-10900K Intel i9-10900K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
vs